
Like many Americans, I’ve spent much of the last six months arguing about Israel and Palestine online. In doing so, I’ve found myself perennially frustrated by how abstract the discussions always seem to be. No matter what, we end up arguing about the philosophical basis on Zionism or the minutiae of historical atrocities, or whether or not specific slogans are antisemitic or not. To me, this is mostly besides the point. The central question of “the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” is whether or not there is a legitimate justification for a state to indefinitely maintain a third of its population under military rule without self-government, self-determination, or political rights. Everything else is commentary. Arguing about the hypothetical benefits of a speculative One State Solution versus the potential problems of a theoretical Two State Solution is essentially pointless, given the actual situation on the ground.
I find this particularly frustrating when arguing with people who would probably describe themselves as Liberal Zionists; people who I think broadly share my values and my vision of what the future could look like, but who end up on the opposite “side” of so many of these debates from me. What I want to do today is try and bring this back to Earth. I want to try and ground this argument in reality, and articulate a practical path forward for people who genuinely want to see peace and equality between the River and the Sea.
Continue reading
